Showing posts with label bad movie. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bad movie. Show all posts

Monday, September 5, 2011

"Red State" - Zach's Take

I really wanted to like Red State. I honestly did. In fact, Maria and I had no intention of reviewing it for CFP until she brought it up after we finished watching it. It's a huge misfire, a complete failure. An utter disappointment.

I was with it for the first 30 minutes or so, despite some awkwardly-acted speech and the complete absence of anything remotely resembling subtlety. Then, as Michael Parks' Abin Cooper delivers his endless sermon detailing the church's beliefs, I realized that's all this movie was going to be. Exposition, weak characterization, and pointless, go-nowhere plot threads.

The film follows three teenagers on a quest to get laid after responding to a Craigslist-like sex solicitation post from a middle-aged woman. Turns out she's a member of the Five Points Church, a riff on the Westboro Baptist Church (despite the film weirdly mentioning the WBC and distinguishing one from the other), a cult that has been capturing gays and killing them, Old Testament style. From there, the movie turns into a siege, as the ATF assaults the compound and a firefight breaks out.

Except the firefight is almost entirely in the background, as John Goodman's ATF Agent character spends ten minutes on the phone in a one-sided conversation with his superior officer. Oh, and that's the second time in the film we see him talking on the phone for an extended period of time. When he's introduced, he takes ten minutes to deliver even more exposition on the Five Points Church, who they are, why they're different from the WBC, and why they've been buying guns. Of course, Kevin Smith cleverly hides this exposition by having John Goodman's wife cook breakfast. Now that's cinema!

There's a point, late in the film, where John Goodman's character mentions that he rarely finishes his supper. Now, all congratulations are in order to Mr. Goodman for losing so much weight, but in Red State, he DEFINITELY does not look like a guy who rarely finishes his meals.

There's really a lot to dislike about Red State. It starts interesting plot threads in one scene that never develop because a character gets shot and killed in the next. It's stupidly nihilistic, like a first draft screenplay written by a 15-year-old kid who just heard about the Wesboro crazies and the atrocities at Waco. There's no payoff. No reason to care about anything that happens on screen, because it's either too silly to accept or too overwrought and melodramatic to have any impact.

There's one major thing that happens towards the end which feels like the movie is finally going to become interesting, only to be explained away in the final exposition dump. I mean, it would have been silly and completely out-there, but at least it wouldn't have been dull like the rest of the film.

I suppose we could applaud Kevin Smith for trying something new, but this movie feels really amateur. And while he might have stepped out of his comfort zone, nothing in the film feels bold or daring. It strives to be ambitious, but it feels like a small, contained movie, with a ton of bizarre tonal shifts. One moment it's a Hostel-style horror movie, the next it's an action, then a comedy.

Red State is, sadly, a bad movie. The only slightly redeeming thing about it is Michael Parks' acting, but the film surrounding him is so bad, such a chore, that it all goes to waste.

Please go back to being funny, Kevin.

Saturday, January 22, 2011

"Airline Disaster" -Maria's Take

*Spoiler Alert*

The title is misleading. The "disaster" never happens...well, maybe when the investors threw money at Asylum to make yet another "contribution" to the film industry (ayuck ayuck).

Anyway, this movie is just bad. I don't know what I expected. I guess i thought this would be a "guilty pleasure" bad movie. One that was so bad it was funny. However, this movie just drags. Basically, this brand new Concorde-style plane is taking its maiden voyage. Little do the passengers know, the Aryan Brotherhood (take THAT political correctness) plans to hijack the plane to steal some bonds on board. Is that really the best Asylum could do? I can understand the Aryan Brotherhood, nobody likes them, they are a safe villian. However, they want to steal bonds? There is no political agenda, nothing the least bit controversial, and to top it all off, the villains are stupid. A lot of this felt like a ripoff of the original Die Hard. But where Hans Gruber is cunning, a truly worthy adversary, these bad guys make countless mistakes and it is just embarrassing to watch.

While the plane is being hijacked, the president, played by TV's Meredith Baxter (again with the political correctness), seeks the best way to deal with the Aryan Brotherhood's demands. Just for good measure, the screenwriters' (yes, plural, there were 3 actually) made the plane's pilot the president's brother. See what they did there? They reversed that ol' damsel in distress business. It is a really progressive movie (facepalm). Anyway, the president and her pilot-brother keep talking in code, using shared childhood memories to communicate. The problem with this bit of sentimentalizing is that the audience is isolated from this bit of reminiscing. I guess it isn't that important, but it just felt very lazy.

Long story short, after the plane nearly crashes in Richmond, Virginia (again, the filmmakers were trying to keep this as nonthreatening a movie as possible), it lands safely in a river near Washington, DC. Before safely landing however, it does take the the top off of the Washington monument. And, because of this movie's ridiculous social/political correctness, I cannot help but think this is some act of feminism... Ultimately, everyone is happy and the country is saved. Blah. Blah. Blah.

My biggest problem with this film as a whole, is it lacks sincerity. It is so drowned in its own smugness (lady president, lady air marshal, man in distress) that it makes it lame to watch. Film and literary archetypes should be the key factors in a film like this. I want misogynistic military guys acting tough, I want smart villains, I want gratuitous violence! A movie called "Airline Disaster" should not be the medium for one to stand on a soapbox and preach social progression.